By John M. Hotchner

What do you see when you receive a stamp on an envelope or at a post office? The average user of the mails might notice a bit of color; maybe even the subject or design, but by 20 minutes later most could not tell you what the design illustrated.

Stamp collectors are different. We look at the stamp, classify it according to whether it is a common variety or something more interesting, and decide whether to keep it. And perhaps at the subconscious level, we also evaluate modern stamps in the context of what has gone before — and for many of us, the comparison is often not positive.

For most people, stamps are a means to an end. For collectors, they can be that, but most importantly, they are an end in themselves. So, what is it that collectors find attractive and unattractive about these objects of our affection? At the most obvious level, which the non-collector also sees but may not appreciate, there are ten factors:

a. Color, either monocolor or multicolor. Most of today’s stamps are a mix of colors because the general public has voted for this with their wallets. They find multicolor more pleasing and attractive, regardless of what the colors may be. Collectors tend to notice the colors used, and make judgments about the attractiveness, the appropriateness, and the arrangement of the colors.

b. Print Quality, Part I For collectors, especially those of the old school, the Gold Standard is single color that has been printed by recess engraving. We find these examples of the engraver’s and printer’s art near irresistible. Unfortunately, they are more expensive to produce and have become a victim of the Postal Service’s bean counters. The USPS budgeting process values cost avoidance before all else; second, revenue, and then in third place they may evaluate how customer preference might intersect with the other two. They see collectors more as cash cows to be milked than as a constituency to be pleased (though I don’t think the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee totally buys into that), so we don’t see many recess engraved stamps among the new issues of the United States. Of the majority, whether we can identify them or not, we tend to react better to photogravure printing than offset.

c. Print Quality, Part II Advances in printing technology have over the years since our first postage stamps in 1847, improved the uniformity and the quality of stamps coming off the presses. It used to be that a collector could make their life’s work the study of a single stamp in all its varieties. On most of today’s stamps, it is a struggle to find an example that differs in any significant way from all its brothers and sisters.

d. The Topic/Subject may be the first thing we all consciously notice and react to. For the general public, it may be the only criterion for what to buy, while collectors have more subtle and more complicated reactions. All buyers/viewers like a pretty flower stamp. But for the general public, that is where it ends. For collectors, a little of that (puppies, lighthouses, birds, costumes, etc.) goes a long way. We prefer topics with some gravitas: history illustrated though events and the people who excelled in their fields and contributed to making America great, events that advance the human condition like space stamps, scientific discoveries and medical advances.

e. The Design is of little importance to the general public, but of supreme importance to collectors. The Postal Service has two responsibilities here: First, to convey the subject clearly on a small palette, and second, to reflect the full range of American art styles in its stamps. That includes, among others, abstract art, comic art, impressionism, pop art and photography. But a large percentage of collectors are traditionalists; not fond of anything not, well, traditional. So, collectors have a full range of thoughts and feelings on the art used for any given subject. While cocktail parties talk Trump, stamp club meetings talk stamp design trends, especially as represented on new issues.

f. The Size which is always “the bigger the better” unless you are the public, having to carry around giant Priority Mail, Express Mail or large commemorative stamps. Now, the reality is that the extra weight and size of large commemoratives is hardly worth considering, but the general public has its concerns and this is undeniably one of them. Collectors on the other hand generally revel in ‘bigger is better’ when contemplating stamps they liked, but will immediately jump to critic mode when the stamp is a large version of something they don’t like.

g. Stamp Shape which draws the same kinds of complaints when non-traditional circular, especially tall or wide, or triangular stamps are issued. The USPS sees these as interesting variations on what might otherwise be a boring theme, and believes they bait the stamp collecting hook (of which more later), but collector reaction is by and large not complimentary.

h. Stamps In Souvenir Sheets clearly intended by the USPS not for postal use but for collectors. Few such sheets are used on mail, but then, it requires real effort to remove the postage from the excess paper for use. So, while many collectors enjoy them as philatelic souvenirs, the same collectors may be annoyed, feeling that they are being fleeced.

i. Face Value has risen with inflation, and has risen even faster if Priority Mail, Express Mail and souvenir sheets are counted in. The public buys what they need and it is fee for service. But it requires a real act of will for a collector to lay out over $80 for a new Express Mail plate block (every 18 months or so), and in this way, the USPS is pricing itself out of the market as the vast majority of stamp collectors are not in that league.

j. Multi-Stamp Sets combined with face value, make even relatively inexpensive stamps an investment when there are 10 or 20 different pets, Harry Potter characters, Peanuts Christmas stamps, etc. It used to be this was limited to commemorative subjects, but in recent years the Postal Service has extended it into the domain of definitives. All of this tends to encourage stamp collectors to avoid mint stamps, and to concentrate on used. (But even this is more difficult to swing now that most self-sticks can’t be washed.)

At the second level are the technical details of the stamp. These are almost totally ignored by the general public if they are noticed at all. Again there are multiple aspects:

a. The Paper Used, And Its Color which can be bright to dull, thin to thick, coated or not, and pregummed or gummed after printing. In the olden says, there was also the issue of watermarks.

b. The Tagging which can be in the paper, on top of the paper, overall or block, and can fluoresce in many colors.

c. The Gum which can be flat or shiny, ridged or not, and self-stick (with the consequent problems of aging and nonwashability). On this one there is a sharp split between collectors and non-collectors. The latter generally love self-sticks. Collectors are ok with them if used stamps can be washed from envelops, but unalterably opposed, with flashes of anger, if they don’t wash.

d. The Means Of Separation which used to be simple perforations (holes between the stamps), but has now moved on to die cuts of various shapes and sizes often with several variations on the stamps of a single issue.

e. Added Factors such as plate numbers and what they represent, the copyright or issue date, secret marks to deter counterfeiting (often in the form of microprinting, or opticalvariable devices), and backing paper which is now an integral part of collecting a “mint” stamp.

Collectors may ignore or study the multiple variations in each of these second level categories.

At the third level; some of which are obvious even to the non-collector, and many of which are not, are unintended production varieties. These are often termed in philately EFOs, for Errors, Freaks and Oddities. Each of these is a term of art that has a lengthy definition, and if you want to learn more about this area, visit www.efocc.org, the website of the EFO Collectors Club.

To the extent that the general public cares about these at all, it is because they have found something really obvious like a missing color, or unintended imperfs. Sometimes they will turn these back into the post office, saying something like, “Take these back and give me good ones that I can use.” For the more philatelically aware, the immediate question is how do they turn these into money?

Collectors are more likely to keep EFOs, as even minor examples are relative rarities. The truly dedicated will also use EFOs as a window on the production process; as a means of understanding the fascinating world of stamp printing.

Can we learn anything from this brief review of the properties of a stamp, and the differences in how stamps are seen by collectors and non-collectors?

I think a primary lesson is that the USPS is in a no-win situation. In order to get the attention of non-collectors and to draw them into the hobby, they have to produce an unending stream of stamps with popular themes that the general public will pay attention to, but which dyed-in-the-wool collectors often find annoying and manipulative.

Another is that there is much more to stamps than the general public ever thinks about, and much more for collectors to think about and enjoy than most have time, money or inclination for.

The “old” way of collecting a mint example of every stamp the United States has issued is now a huge challenge (with over 5500 different stamps; many of the earliest examples beyond the ability of our wallets to acquire). So country collecting — even in used-stamps form — is giving way to topical collecting and discreet time period-collecting.

Very little of this is obvious to us as we look at a stamp we buy or receive on an envelope today.

Should you wish to comment on this editorial, or have questions or ideas you would like to have explored in a future column, please write to John Hotchner, VSC Contributor, P.O. Box 1125, Falls Church, VA 22041-0125, or email, putting “VSC” in the subject line.

Or comment right here.

By John M. Hotchner

When my children were in the 8- to 12-year-old range, each one in turn tried stamp collecting. Three of the four even did exhibits. They did not have to be cajoled into it by a clearly involved helicopter father. Rather they were I think curious what I found so attractive, and got involved through participation in a Ben Franklin Stamp Club established at their school (a system the USPS sponsored nationwide; providing a monthly multi-color newsletter and other support materials such as membership cards, etc.). I was the adult sponsor for the local school’s club.

Unfortunately, the hobby did not stick with them. And I can list several reasons why not. First, while there were lots of stamps available to collect, and they were all given free, one of the major areas of interest they had about stamps was their value. I contrast this to my earliest years in the hobby, where the value of my collection was the last thing on my mind.

Now, by the time I was 12, and going to club meetings with my father, I was spending my paltry allowance on stamps. But I was a confirmed collector, and my concern was in filling the blanks in my album, not with what I might get if I sold the stamps.

Some might fault me for allowing my kids to grow up thinking about possessions in monetary terms, but I contend that by the 1980s, the social fabric of our country was intensely intertwined with money and its value/what it could buy. We have in fact bred generations of children who have grown up with ever increasingly targeted advertising, telling kids what they should have; a relative rarity in the days when I grew up with a ten-inch black and white TV screen.

So, in this day of $200 sneakers, $75 jeans being sold new with ripped knees, must-have electronics, and designer tops for kids that adults can’t afford, is it any wonder that money is high on the radar screens of kids who are probably not told enough, “No, we can’t afford that!”

The result is that kids have learned to monetize everything. And when they learn that their entry-level collection is essentially worthless, a reasonable question is “Why do I want to be involved in this?”

That phenomenon was just beginning to kick in when my kids were approaching their teenage years. Also kicking in was the advent of a wider range of TV channels, and one of the great time-wasters of the 20th century, TV video games. My kids were far more interested in how high they could score playing Pac-Man and the immediate feedback that offered, than in spending time on the laborious process of building a stamp collection; which offered no element of competition among their peers, and little in the way of immediate feedback.

Yes, there was some enjoyment in trading stamps with their friends, but nothing compared to the status gained in the “friend community” by playing Pac-Man well. If anything, this challenge to our hobby has increased exponentially with the multiplicity of electronic gadgets, and the ability to communicate instantaneously with friends and acquaintances; now with both words and images. stamp collecting could be addictive if one got serious about it, but today’s electronic gizmos are both instantaneously addictive, and the social pressure to engage in using them is enormous.

One of my grandchildren said to me a couple of weeks ago, “Grandpa, you may know the basics of how to use your iPhone, but you really need to take a course to understand the power it has and the things it can do.” My reaction is that I don’t want to get involved in additional functionality. I already spend more time on it than I find comfortable. But, I, like them, I suspect, can’t seem to help myself! And they are pressured by their peers to obtain and use the most recent gadgets and their full power.

My observation of the behavior of my grandkids, who range from 2-years old to 21 years, is that they spend so much time with their noses buried in their electronic devices it is a wonder they have time to eat or do homework. There is just no time for working with physical objects like stamps.

We did it as kids because we had time on our hands, with few other distractions, and we enjoyed the act of organizing our collection, and the pride of learning about other nations, and American history from stamps.

The other thing we enjoyed was sharing the hobby with others in our circle. With the Postal Service’s murder of its Ben Franklin Stamp Clubs in the early 1990s, it became increasingly unusual for kids to find other kids who collect. Why did they kill the BFSC? The proximate costs of developing collectors for the future were not being covered by young people buying stamps. So the program was a net financial loss, and the bean counters insisted that the budgeting process could not justify those costs. Guess they never heard of what private industry knows as “loss leaders.”

So, the practical result was that more than ever before, kids were suddenly reliant for support on adults; but how to find an adult collector if kids develop an interest? This makes the network of local clubs especially important. But keep in mind that available evidence is that the number of adult collectors has been falling in this country for many years if measured by numbers involved in organized philately, and subscription numbers for philatelic periodicals. There may still be a lot of collectors, but it seems a good share of them are lone wolves; not being involved in local philately, and not available to be mentors.

Add to this that regrettably, all adults are now suspect; so much so that formal mentoring programs for their own protection are vetting mentor applicants against law enforcement databases. Parents without that resource are often not pleased with the thought of having their child interacting with an adult stamp collector whom they don’t know.

Then there is the cost of the hobby which has been on an upward curve for many years. Stamp collecting implements such as catalogs and albums (with thousands more stamps being issued worldwide each year) are beyond the reach of most kids’ allowances. The cost of a first-class mint stamp has gone from 3¢ when I was a kid to 50¢ today, and the number of issues and postal products has mushroomed. I tend to discount this as a major reason for kids dropping out for two reasons: First, the actual cost of a year of single U.S. mint stamps is still way less than a pair of stylish sneakers, a couple of trips to the movies, or a few meals out at your local fast-food outlet.

Second, as they make a fine and relatively inexpensive gift for parents and grandparents to give, mint U.S. stamps need not be beyond the reach of kids. But the adults must be willing to navigate the USPS Internet ordering system, as limited numbers of commemoratives, and sometime none at all, are available from local post offices.

These phenomena are driving kids in the direction of used stamps, and I would have no great problem with this; in fact it could be a positive, but it isn’t. Why? Used is less expensive, but more difficult to acquire; not to mention more difficult to store and house in an album because they can no longer be soaked free of the paper they went through the mail on. And there is another major problem that has been developing for the last 40 years: Though a few remain, local stamp stores have gone the way of the Dodo, stamp clubs are not thriving for the most part, buying used stamps from dealers by email is complicated, and the Postal Service in its zeal to keep collectors from clogging the lines at local post offices has done everything possible to push collectors to buy their wants on the Internet.

This has the predictable effect of keeping commemoratives off daily mail. So, current stamps, which should be a major focus for kids who get many of their stamps from friends and family, get little more than the current definitives from those sources.

No one set out to make collecting more difficult for kids; but we are dealing with 50 years of actions and phenomena that have had a deadly set of unintended consequences.

And some of those consequences are also affecting adult collectors and dampening our ardor for stamp collecting. Do we just lie down on the tracks and let the train run over us?

Should you wish to comment on this editorial, or have questions or ideas you would like to have explored in a future column, please write to John Hotchner, VSC Contributor, P.O. Box 1125, Falls Church, VA 22041-0125, or email, putting “VSC” in the subject line.

Or comment right here.

By John M. Hotchner

Former member of the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee David Eynon (from 1990 until 2008) was a mentor when I joined in 1998, and remains a friend. He is also an exceedingly well-read person who is forever discovering references to stamps, stamp collecting, and post office practices in out-of-the-way literature.

A recent find is from a book of poetry titled 1916 Oxford, St. Bees and the Front, 1911-1916, by H.B.K. (“Rex”) Allpass, who styled himself “Sometime scholar of Exeter College, Oxford; 2nd Lieutenant, the Essex Regiment”. His photo is shown here.

Sadly, Allpass was one of thousands who perished on the Western Front in 1916, but his poetry was recognized as being of high quality, and was collected and preserved in the named book; published after the War by T. Werner Laurie, Ltd., London.

Among his output is the following poem, written in December, 1913:

The Stamp-Collectors’ Aunt
Oh! List to the tragical lachrymose tale
Of Martha Elizabeth Gamp,
Who received by the post the Philatelist’s Grail
A Royal Timbuctean stamp.
Martha Eliza two nephews possessed,
Each a collector of note:
Herbert Antonio Samuel West
And Fawcett Excelsior Choate.
Now Martha, to ways of collecting unused,
Invited both nephews to tea,
With benevolent simper the stamp she produced
And gave it the cousins to see.
Silent they stood, and beheld in amaze,
And praised in full reverent tone,
And focussed its markings with rapturous gazed
And languished to make them their own.
But rapture yields swiftly to rivalrous lust,
And black importunity’s hate:
Though “I cannot decide,” Martha wept,
“But you must,”
They answered, “or death is your fate.”
Thus urged and insisted and threatened they both
With demands that would not be denied,
Till “Fawcett—–“ she murmured.
Then Bert with an oath
Plunged the cake-knife deep in her side.
“Ah, villain!” cried Fawcett,
“Behold what you’ve done!
O’er this ruin you never shall gloat!”
And swift a resilient bun
He thrust down the cousinly throat.
But Bert ere, asphyxiate, life he resigned,
Arose with the rest of his strength,
And Fawcett he pierced ’twixt the shoulders behind
With the cake-knife’s murderous length.
Thus they died; and below with their issuing gore
The ceiling grew ruddily damp,
As there uttered regretfully down to the floor
That Royal Timbuctean stamp.

∞§∞§∞§∞

The lust of which Allpass speaks is one that every stamp collector can identify with, though the outcome of the story teaches that lust, if indulged, can have a harsh price. May we all remember that stamp collecting is a hobby, not a matter of life-and-death!

My thanks to Dave for re-discovering this gem. Now, let me ask you, dear reader, if you have come upon any instance(s) of philately in older literature – either poetry, stories that relate to the hobby, or quotes that re ect upon its benefits or costs?

If so, I would enjoy hearing of them for possible use in this space; with credit to original author and finder/reporter, of course.

Should you wish to comment on this editorial, or have questions or ideas you would like to have explored in a future column, please write to John Hotchner, VSC Contributor, P.O. Box 1125, Falls Church, VA 22041-0125, or email, putting “VSC” in the subject line.

Or comment right here.

by John M. Hotchner

The hunter dreams of a 14-point buck! The stamp collector has equally desirable quarry, and the hunting ground is at any nearby stamp show!

The eight-day international show in New York in 2016 was a 
lollapalooza of an
 event; a familiar 
local show on steroids; with more
than 200 dealers
from around the
world to serve the
tastes of collectors from beginner status to the most discriminating specialist. As one somewhere in the middle of that pack, I was worried that the dealer community would have only expensive material because of the high booth fees an international show commands. I needn’t have been concerned. There was plenty of moderately priced material for all of us without bottomless wallets.

My shopping time was limited by other activities, but over the last three days I got in about six hours of digging through the stocks of a dozen or so dealers.

At every show I go to I hope to make one good find to add to my collection; something that is a combination of good price and interesting item that I can enjoy for years afterward. Often enough, it doesn’t happen (no great items, or a great item at too high a price), but the search is fun, and almost always something of interest will be found to make it worthwhile.

At the New York show two items came my way, and the rest of this column will be devoted to one of them because I am certain there are more examples “out there” waiting to be found.

Poking through the U.S. cover stock of a dealer from another country, I saw a cut square with the dollar values of the 1938 Prexie series, priced at $35. Cancelled in New York City on February 8 of a year that is unclear, it is shown in Figure 1. Given that the catalogue values of the three used stamps is $7, I hesitated. The combination is unusual, but 5x catalog unusual?

Taking a closer look, the first thing to be noticed was that the $2 is a nice color misregistration. I like to find the heads of the dollar value Prexies misregistered in one direction or another, and the $2 is the hardest to find. On this one the vignette is quite far to the left; which would not please Republican Pres. Warren G. Harding, who is pictured on the stamp.

Next was noticing that the Calvin Coolidge head on the $5 was low on that stamp. At about this time, I concluded that the $35 asking price was reasonable, and I reached for my wallet.

But wait — something about that $5 rang a bell. The reddish frame color was much darker than the normal “carmine” noted in the Scott Catalogue. Having seen this before on mint $5 examples submitted for expertizing, my mind’s eye pictured a reference photo I had been given by the late Joseph Thompson, who was a scholar in this realm. The photo is shown in Figure 2.

Could the $5 on this cut square be the rather rare “red brown” error that is listed in Scott’s? For $35 I was more than willing to take a chance until I could get it home and check my reference material.

Fast-forward a week, and I am pleased to say that the variety checks out. It appears to be what Scott calls No. 834a, red brown and black, mint value (never hinged) $2750; used in period, $7000. It only remains to have it expertized.

What is the story to this stamp, and why is the used value so much higher than the mint? A dive into my files provides considerable detail, which I will summarize below based on several articles from the philatelic press, auction listings, and a Thompson article* from The United States Specialist, monthly magazine of the United States Stamp Society.

All telling of the story of the #834a agree that the first reports of the error in the trade are attributed to U.S. expert and philatelic columnist (for Mekeel’s) George B. Sloane, in about 1947. He sent one on approval to a potential buyer in 1951 (asking price $75), writing the following note:

“I thought you would like to see the stamp. It was a comparatively small lot — about 90 stamps (most in blocks). I have held them up for almost four years but no more have shown up. It is my opinion that the stamp will continue to advance…. The color is definite and marked.”

Sloane had queried the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, the printer of these stamps, in 1950, and provided samples. He received a detailed response, dated April 18, 1950. Its essence is summarized by the following excerpt:

“…Stamps having the approximate color of these [submitted] stamps can result from either of two fundamentally different causes. Such stamps could have been produced at the time of printing in this bureau if the ink had become contaminated with minute quantities of black ink or carbon black… The second possible cause for the color of such stamps arises from the fact that the ink used in printing the border of these stamps contains certain components which darken perceptibly in the presence of a chemical… The bureau receives numerous inquiries concerning similar color changes in stamps in which it is apparent that these changes are produced by chemical treatment or by storage in the presence of certain gaseous chemicals after the stamps have left this bureau. Laboratory tests showed that five-dollar Coolidge stamps can be changed in color by chemicals so as to form an almost perfect visual color match with the stamps obtained from you…”

The letter goes on to explain that the submitted stamps were tested and determined to be unaltered by chemicals; thus a genuine variety.

Sloane’s report is, however, not the first sighting of this error. In the cited U.S. Specialist article, Thompson and Gill provide information on the first find of these stamps. They were first discovered by postal clerk Ralph Davis, who was also a well-known and respected philatelist from northern Virginia. He reported the purchase of two plate blocks of the error in 1938-39, at the post office where he worked. Given his status, he could not make a philatelic splash about his find, but he noted that other copies of the error were sold over the counter before it was noticed, identified and reported to postal authorities.

Davis told Thompson and Gill that “…over a million dollars’ worth of stamps of the error of color were recalled and destroyed when they were discovered.” This equates to 2,000 panes of 100 stamps with each pane containing one plate block.

As to numbers that got into philatelic hands, Thompson and Gill stated, “Since Davis said the error was sold over the counter before it was discovered, there could be any number of errors in existence. We have heard of only two canceled copies, about 100 mint singles, and nine plate blocks, although more may exist.”

So, with this background, could the Figure 1 cut square contain a genuine 834a? I would offer the following observations. The year in the cancellation cannot be determined. It would have to be 1939 or after.

The New York usage could be from the Davis find, or the Sloane find. Sloane was based in New York, but some of the undetermined number of $5 errors sold in northern Virginia could also have migrated to New York. And those purchased at Ralph Davis’ post office would likely not have been identified as anything special.

In addition I would posit that anyone trying to make examples of this error by chemically altering normal copies would identify the product as the error, so as to sell it at a premium. That clearly is not the case with the Figure 1 cut square.

Finally, chemical alterations generally affect more than just the intended color. In this case, the paper would also be altered in color. And the ultraviolet (UV) properties of the paper will also differ from normal.

Again, after inspection under 30x magnification, and with both longwave and shortwave UV, I can say that neither is the case here.

My conclusion is that there is every likelihood that the Figure 1 example is genuine. I will submit it for expertizing, and report the results here once I have received the opinion.

Addendum: The Philatelic Foundation found that the stamp “is not Scott 834a, rather it is a Scott 834, carmine and black, the carmine color oxidized.” PF did not provide any information as to how they reached that conclusion.

*Thompson, Joseph S., Jr. and Gill, Norma E., “The $5 Coolidge Error of Color,” The United States Specialist, July, 1990, pp 399-410. Published by The United States Stamp Society.

Should you wish to comment on this column, or have questions or ideas you would like to have explored in a future column, please write to John Hotchner, VSC Contributor, P.O. Box 1125, Falls Church, VA 22041-0125, or email, putting “VSC” in the subject line.

Or comment right here.

Collecting to Sell
By John M. Hotchner

I recently received a letter that threw me for a bit of a loop. I’m going to quote it below, edited a bit to eliminate repetition, and then make a few comments. Yours would be welcome also.

The Letter: “I’m not a dealer per se. I am for all practical purposes an accumulator. I buy what I can, U.S. issues only. My holdings gathered over the last 65 years are extensive. I have no need or desire or intention to sell anything. What I’m doing in increasing my holdings is easy-going and enjoyable.

“When I make a purchase, I weed out everything used that is not of collector grade: anything torn, creased, stained, or with short perfs I simply discard. I do so because no one will buy things in those categories. Thus, out it goes.

“For mint singles, blocks, etc., I do likewise, except that I use the pitch-outs for postage. Mostly with stuff like that I run into thins or disturbed gum as a disqualifier. As to centering, if it is only Fine — it goes into my scrap postage box.

“What upsets me most up here in the Midwest is that when one talks with a dealer about having them make an offer — they automatically tell you, ‘I’ve got all of that; not interested in buying any more, etc., etc.’ One cannot help but wonder how dealers stay in business without upgrading or expanding their own inventory.

“I bring this to your attention because of my experience at the American Philatelic Society stamp show in Milwaukee a few years ago. I approached the booth of a major national stamp retailer who does a lot of advertising, and talked to the owner. I asked him if he would be interested in buying my duplicates from the 1922 definitive issue?

“He told me, flat out, ‘No’…. Claimed they have all this stuff and would not be buying any more of it for the foreseeable future. Suggested I go and chat with another dealer present. I did and I purchased over $1000 worth of items for my personal holdings.

“Bottom line is when I returned home I ordered, from the national firm, a Scott #560 (8¢ Perf. 11×11, 1922) plate block, Mint, Never Hinged, in Very Fine to Extra Fine condition. I got an immediate reply saying that they have been unable to keep this in inventory for the past ten years. Just in case the reply was wrong, I tried again this past February. Same result, except that as a courtesy, they noted that had recently acquired some plate blocks of the 1922 issue, but they were only in Fine condition, and would I be interested? I would not.

“The point I make is this: Dealers and stamp company owners are for the most part totally unaware of what is actually happening with their own inventory; thus trying to deal with these people is a real — in your face — put down.

“However, if one works with their own holdings, we have a lot better idea of areas of weakness, and heavy duplication. Ignorance is expensive.

“Over the years I’ve read many offers to buy. One buyer from the Chicago area even sent a representative up for a look-see about 10 years ago. He was definitely interested, but not in paying a fair price. He wanted to steal my holdings at 9% of catalogue value. He had the grace to look insulted when I rejected his offer.

“Thus, I have decided to continue my efforts of accumulating, and at my demise, deed over to my son all of my philatelic holdings. What I’ve set aside for him will be used to augment his business as a dealer when he retires. For now he is a collector of mint singles, but then he will also have a large holding of high-grade plate blocks. By doing this, we will just bypass all the con artists.

“I don’t know for certain if I am doing right by pushing the dealer issue down the road one generation — but it sure feels right to me and to my son. I have found that the hobby is a great way to stay in touch as a family.”

My comments (addressed to readers, not the letter writer as we have had subsequent correspondence): While disclaiming any intention of selling anything, our letter writer has made movements in that direction, and did not like the responses he got, so walked away from the deal. In another effort in that direction, he was rebuffed by a dealership where one hand seems not to know what the other hand is doing, and that experience ticked him off. I can sympathize. My reading is that he came to the no-sell decision after the experiences he describes.

While he indicates that he has 1922 material to sell, that is the earliest he mentions, and two things occur to me. First, while there is some good material in that era, stamps and even plate blocks in premium condition starting in the late 1920s are not difficult to fnd; and not difficult for dealers to purchase in bulk at favorable prices. Secondly, it is possible that the dealer(s) assumed that the bulk of the material offered was from the later era, and truly did not fit in with their needs.

It is also possible that the dealer was put off by the manner of approach or another factor, and chose not to do business with the letter-writer.

Stockpiling material from the era where good quality is available in quantity (say much of the material from the late 1920s to modern times) is not a good investment strategy. Yes, some items, carefully selected from among the most often seen material, can be good for investment: unfolded booklet panes, some popular theme se-tenants like Space and Lighthouses; high face plate blocks, etc. are okay.

But the bottom dropped out of the plate block market many years ago in the 13¢ First Class era when the USPS tried to take advantage of the market by issuing 12-stamp plate blocks. It has never been restored to its former glory. Most from the 1940s on sell wholesale in the best circumstances at face, and even below. Consult catalogue prices to get an idea of what few plate blocks are more desirable.

However, if one is determined to invest, the same amount of money put into classic material will bring better rewards. You will have less material, but it will appreciate. And it will sell more readily, and for better prices. Remember this rule of thumb: “Common material remains common. Proven high quality/limited quantity material appreciates.”

On dealers’ buy offers, two things: One is that they are entitled to try to pay the lowest price they can get away with. Don’t you as a collector try to pay the lowest possible price for your acquisitions? Second, while I am not claiming that 9% is a fair figure (though it is understandable for mostly modern stamps/blocks that will retail for half cat. or less), keep in mind that dealers selling most modern material to knowledgeable collectors will not be able to get more than that, and may well get less; and they have their overhead to pay for. And, oh yes, the object is to make a profit. For example, how much does it cost them to send a representative to visit to review your material in your home and make an offer?

That said, the seller always has the ultimate power: You can always try to negotiate a better price, and failing that, you can refuse to sell.

Finally, on the subject of kicking the can down to the next generation, it seems like a good strategy in this case as the son intends to be a dealer, and will sell the high quality items at retail to collectors, while the father is selling to dealers at wholesale.

So, in summary, let’s call this method of collecting what it is: Investing. There is nothing dishonorable about it. It can even be as enjoyable to the collector as collecting for pleasure. But I feel that investors have to go into that pursuit with eyes wide open; not with hope, prayer and assumptions about what ought to happen when they get ready to sell.

As with any financial transaction where entrepreneurs are hoping to make a profit, it is a tough world out there. Willing buyers at your price can be a good deal more scarce than you hoped. People not willing to pay your price are not necessarily stupid, crooked or hard-hearted.

They are steely-eyed realists. And you need to be too.

Should you wish to comment on this column, or have questions or ideas you would like to have explored in a future column, please write to John Hotchner, VSC Contribu-tor, P.O. Box 1125, Falls Church, VA 22041-0125, or email, putting “VSC” in the subject line.

Or comment right here.

Finding Time to Collect
By John M. Hotchner

Busy! Busy! Busy! That is what we all seem to be; running from commitment to commitment, keeping up with family, keeping up with current events in this election year so we can be responsible voters, paying attention to the grass, the roof, the siding, taking out the garbage, and a thousand other things that seem to rate high on the Must Do list.

I think one of the things getting in the way of stamp collecting these days is the multiplicity of things to do (including 900 TV channels, the iPhone, the time required for exercise, etc.); much of which were not there to tempt us 50-and-more years ago when stamp collecting was in its heyday; before its share of the population began to decline. Oh yes, and don’t let me forget the increased responsibilities we have when both spouses work, with the need to apportion household chores in ways that were not an issue when my father brought in the bucks, and my mother took care of the kids and the house.

It is a different world; and in many ways a better and more satisfying one despite the more hectic pace we keep up. As a retiree, I thought I would spend my days at leisure, but I seem to be busier than ever. I’m told that this is not an unusual situation.

So, given that it is difficult to shoehorn into the day discretionary activities like stamp collecting, how to find (or make) time to work on our collections? Many people I have known have said at one time or another that they ‘don’t have time to do such-and-such.’

It may be true for them, but it is a phrase I never use. I prefer to think of that problem in terms of making time to do the things I really want to do. If I can’t, then I don’t want to do them badly enough! What follows is my sharing of how I fit stamp collecting into my day.

I have to start off this little essay by owning up to the fact that I do not own the revealed truth. I have some ways that I find time, but recognize that they may not work for you. And there may be others I could benefit from, and I am looking forward to hearing from readers with your hints about how you find time. I will share these in a future column.

My primary ‘trick’ is to treat household chores as the first priority. While that might seem counterintuitive, the division of labor in our house is clear, and the things I am supposed to do get done with a minimum of fuss. Getting them done to my wife’s satisfaction leaves me in charge of the time that is left. And I can devote it to collecting activities without recrimination or guilt.

Secondly, I prioritize my collecting activities at a high level so that it is both normal and natural for me to spend some time every day working on my collection; doing the never-ending tasks that are needed to organize; to keep the collection from taking over first closets, then the dining room table, then the whole house.

Contrary to scientific studies that say multitasking is bad practice, even unhealthy, I’ve been doing it for 60 years, and it works for me. I can’t just watch TV, or talk on the phone, or stand in a line. These are opportunities to catch up on philatelic reading, outline articles, sort, catalog, answer mail.

In truth, there are some creative things like actually writing the articles and designing exhibit pages that need full attention, but it is surprising how much can be done with other lighter activities.

Another helpful practice is my penchant for the evening nap. Conking out for 90 minutes after dinner allows me to work uninterrupted and fairly fresh, into the wee hours. At that time there are no interruptions, and it is not unusual that I lose track of time.

Even when I had a day job, this allowed me “stamp collection time” for a couple of hours each evening.

Another element is motivation. When what I did was all up to me, there was not much motivation to get on with it. Then I began joining clubs and societies and getting involved in their projects and specialties. Suddenly, there was more reading to keep up with, more interesting specialty areas to dig into, more things to look for on my stamps, and on the other end of the equation, more people interested in what I was doing; sometimes even waiting for the results of my activities; as in hoping for trading material to be available, or the results of my research.

In my job, I traveled — a lot; up to a third of the time. This gave me all sorts of opportunities. My ‘airplane reading’ file provided enjoyment on long flights. Evenings while others might be out for lavish dining or other night-time activities, I more often sat in my hotel room working on a project; be it washing, bringing an album current, checking with magnifier in hand for plate varieties, doing sales book pages, or whatever needed to be done. Not only did I save a lot of money — money that could be available for philatelic purchases — I kept off extra pounds, arrived for work the next day refreshed, and I had a sense of accomplishment to boot.

These days I travel to see grandchildren and for the occasional stamp show. Stamp projects are always part of my packing. I am hopeful that the grandchildren pick up more than a little of my enthusiasm for collecting; and not just a sense that grandpa is obsessed with little bits of paper. Some have given it a try, but gone on to other things. Others show little interest beyond asking what I am doing. But even there, I like to think I am sowing seeds.

My own four children got into the hobby to the point of exhibiting, but moved on. One is a certified collector — but of sports cards! Perhaps the longer term benefit to them was simply seeing me enjoying my philatelic work, day-in and day-out. (All of them spent some time in my “real” office also.) Each of them has an excellent work ethic, and I would like to think that part of their development was internalizing what they saw as my enjoyment in my work; though it is hard to think of my philatelic endeavors as “work” in the usually-accepted sense.

Which leads me to talk a little bit about the benefits of working on your stamp collection. Getting done what you get done is its own reward, but there are hidden benefits as well. Getting into your project of the day mostly banishes your other cares; some of which can be heavy burdens about which you can do little but try to live through. With stamps, you are able to organize that corner of your world in a pleasing way. So, you gain relaxation, stress reduction, exercise your organizing skills, and some level of control over a largely uncontrollable world.

Some people take pills to achieve those goals. Not my path!

So, it is the wise person who finds in hobbies a more natural method of stress management. Whether philately, sports cards, coins, comic books, or whatever else floats your boat, it is good to put some effort into establishing goals and working toward them.

Should you wish to comment on this column, or have questions or ideas you would like to have explored in a future column, please write to John Hotchner, VSC Contributor, P.O. Box 1125, Falls Church, VA 22041-0125, or email, putting “VSC” in the subject line.

Or comment right here.

Stamps As Art
By John M. Hotchner

We as stamp collectors have a narrow focus on stamps. We think of them as stamps that belong in a given space in an album, rather than as miniature art works. The difference may be critical to our ability to repopularize stamp collecting.

As stamp collectors, we certainly notice and have opinions on design and general attractiveness. But we are not professional art critics. Each of us knows what he or she likes. But we come at the subject from a hard-wired view that is heavily influenced by what we grew up with in the hobby, and by what we saw as we used stamps before getting into philately.

What this means is that most of us who are 50 and above long for the good old days of engraved stamps; which we think of as more intricately designed, and with ink raised off the paper that gives both a feel and a visual impression of quality. Indeed, a well-designed stamp produced by intaglio is a thing of beauty.

But this is not what I am talking about when I speak of Stamps as Art. As a percentage of our population of roughly 320 million, people with an interest in stamp collecting who have gone beyond throwing the occasional interesting stamp in a box, probably are less than half of 1%. But the figure is much, much higher for people who have enough interest in art to visit an art museum, buy prints to collect, or even buy art to decorate their homes.

How wonderful would it be for our hobby if even a small percentage of that much larger group could be lured into stamp collecting using as a hook, the beauty of these miniature art works. Virtually every type of art with a following in the general population can be found on many stamps. So, how do we appeal to those who love art?

I think we have to start with the fact that most people have only the sketchiest idea of what it means to be a stamp collector; and a good share of those impressions are wrong. A part of this ignorance is that many think of stamp collecting as an expensive hobby; yet art-oriented folks don’t know that the form of art in which they have an interest is available for relatively pennies on the dollar, as compared to what original art, and even prints, can cost.

Perhaps the closest model we have within the hobby today is the people who collect Christmas subjects on stamps, especially those who collect traditional religious images which are overwhelmingly classic artworks.

A good share of these collectors don’t fit the mold of the classic collector, but they love their stamps; yet without those subjects most would not be stamp collectors. But having started with the theme, many have become collectors who appreciate and are interested in stamp printing, seek varieties, like first day covers and commercial usages, bid in auctions, join clubs and societies, and come to be both stamp collectors and art appreciators. I’d also suggest that we need to think of art on stamps writ large: not just works using brush strokes, but other forms of art including sculpture, ballet, stage and screen, photography, the artists themselves, and many other categories. And yes, even art produced specifically as models for stamp designs and the stamp designs themselves.

So, I will posit that one major way to improve the reach of our hobby is for those of us in it to put a great deal more emphasis on outreach to non-collectors appealing principally to their love of art and the arts — both in terms of themes, and in terms of artistic styles.

How? Here are a few ideas:

1. The USPS/CSAC might consider issuing more stamps showing artworks, and in larger formats (One thinks of the beautiful and immensely popular large French stamps releases.)
We can look for opportunities to hold rstor second-day ceremonies at institutions displaying and promoting art and the arts—especially those with large public support/volunteer groups behind them.

2. Let’s have much more publicity by the USPS about the design process, the rejected designs, and why the design chosen was selected. As part of this effort (which stamp collectors also find fascinating), have the CSAC Design Coordinators make “YouTube” videos on their craft to circulate to art appreciation groups, and have them address conventions of appropriate groups.

3. The Postal Service, which already sells greeting cards, can expand that product line using stamp images.

4. Hobby institutions (USPS/APS/Specialty societies focused on a design theme that includes art) can partner with art museums to present the art of philately in featured exhibits.

5. Specialty societies with a design theme that includes art also can present philately in the institutional publications of non-collecting affinity groups (e.g., American Medical Association for medical related, DAR and others for history related, religious groups for Christmas related, aeronautical groups for airplane illustrations, U.S. Naval Institute for stamps honoring naval history, ornithological groups for bird designs, etc.)

6. We can work with school art appreciation programs/teachers to include the miniature art of stamps in the curriculum, and use stamp design contests to teach elements of composition. There could even be doctoral dissertations looking into the progression of artistic style in U.S. stamps, and other art/stamps subjects.

7. Posters featuring the art of stamps can be provided by the USPS to post offices and libraries.

8. Collectors/stamp clubs can make presentations to art appreciation societies.
Production of coffee table books emphasizing different themes and art styles can be co-sponsored by a philatelic organization and an art museum.

9. We also could have more articles in the philatelic press and society journals that focus on the art of the stamp, art and the arts. This need not be every issue, but often enough to support and encourage those whose collecting motivation is in this sector.

10. Finally, let’s moderate the complaining about artistic style within the hobby. There needs to be more recognition that it is legitimate to portray a wide range of artistic style. Like what you like and ignore what you don’t. Issuing broadsides against what you don’t like simply leaves a poor impression of the hobby — especially among those who might get serious about it.

Blaise Pascal is quoted as saying that “All the great maxims have been written. It only remains to put them into practice.” I am certain that there are more ideas that readers can think of to add to the dozen above, so let’s hear from you! But all the ideas in the world remain sterile unless they are put into practice. So, I am hoping that those who can move these ideas forward will try them out, improve on them, and help us grow the hobby!

Should you wish to comment on this column, or have questions or ideas you would like to have explored in a future column, please write to John Hotchner, VSC Contributor, P.O. Box 1125, Falls Church, VA 22041-0125, or email, putting “VSC” in the subject line.

Or comment right here.

“Why Do You Need More Stamps?”
by John M. Hotchner

Early on, as my wife watched my stamp collection take over more and more square feet in our house, she asked the $64,000 Question: “Why do you need more stamps? You have so many already.” It is a reasonable question; perhaps akin to “Why do race car drivers keep going around in circles?”

It all makes sense to the participants — and to those who enjoy the ride vicariously; but why a collector collects, and why enough is never enough, are more difficult questions. Over the years I have tried to explain my reasons for pursuing more and better stamps and covers, and it is fair to say that I have never quite hit the mark, and certainly have not been able to overcome her assumption that there is a point at which a collection is complete; somewhat like the point at which the house has enough curtains and needs no more.

It fact, collections are never complete unless the collector wants them to be. And I don’t. Completeness signifies the end of collecting that particular thing, and moving on to something else — or nothing else. It is not where I want to be.

I like stamps and covers, and the discovery of new pathways of the hobby. In fact, what my wife sees as my collection — writ large — is really made up of a lot of small collections. And I like the feeling of having many philatelic balls in the air, and knowing that I can go to a bourse and be certain that I can find something new to enhance one or more of them.

I may add nothing to one collection for years, but another may grow like Topsy because I luck into a good source. Furthermore, it is not unusual to trip over something that is so interesting, it leads to yet another collecting category.

My wife and I have not buried this issue. Instead we have agreed to disagree. I’ve tried to compare the question to the issue of why she needs yet another pair of shoes, but it’s not the same thing she says: She doesn’t collect shoes for their beauty, for their story, to categorize…. She wears shoes; they have a functional value. The only things stamps are good for is mailing a letter.

So, it is time to gather in one place the six reasons (or excuses, if that is how you look at it) I’ve advanced for why I keep buying more stamps, ad to try to look beyond them. I think that the list makes a compelling case. But to accept that it does, requires being able to walk in my shoes, and understand the pleasures I get from the hobby.

Anyway, here goes:

1. One of the characteristics of Mankind is acquisitiveness. Not many can avoid it, and there are many different degrees. But it is normal. And for those born with what I like to call The Collector Gene, a specific area can start as an interest, progress to a passion, and somewhere along the line turn into an addiction. Different people may assess that hold over an individual’s actions differently. I don’t see my addiction to philately as a bad thing. My spouse is not so sure that my level of self-control is up to the task of keeping me within practical limits. I like to point out that unlike some, we have not had to buy a larger house, or a second home, to house the collection; though I do have to admit that the collection does get in the way of downsizing!
2. I buy individual stamps to complete album pages. I find it very satisfying to complete an album page. Of such little victories is life made up.
3. And I buy specific stamps and covers to add to exhibits. Often this is just to fill a perceived gap, but sometimes the item ads to the body of knowledge about what is being exhibited. Previously unreported significant items in an exhibit are worth their weight toward a gold medal, but it is also a wonderful feeling to know that you have advanced the frontiers of knowledge.
4. I buy collections because I am a passionate searcher for varieties. It is not enough to fill preprinted album pages. I am fascinated by interesting cancellations, revenue stamps, per ns, precancels, sheet markings, color varieties, misperforations, printing flaws. As often as not these are 10¢ items that dealers hardly ever stock, and the best way to find them is in old collections. (What I don’t use from collections gets traded, sold or donated. Unlike some, my house is not burdened by boxes of collection remainders.)
5. I buy stamps and covers to write about in my various columns. Deadlines are harsh taskmasters, and finding new material is not only a necessity, but helps me to manage deadlines. Especially given the breadth and depth of U.S. philately, something new is always popping up that will with a little research to complement it, will make an interesting story.
6. In my old age, with all our children on their own, and our physical needs taken care of, I buy the occasional stamp or cover (unrelated to an existing collection) that I have always admired and wanted. Why? Because it pleases me!

As I reread this, there is surely an element of self-indulgence in philatelic acquisitiveness. It prompts the question, Would I be a better person if I were spending the same money on diamond earrings for my wife — or annual vacations in Paris — or simply padding the savings account? Perhaps by some measures.

But these are questions each of us has to answer for him- or herself. As for me, stamp and cover collecting is my one extravagance. I don’t spend money on cigarettes, alcohol, caviar, thousand dollar suits, or the gambling tables in Atlantic City. Philately is not about acquiring mountains of money or social status — in fact to the average non-collector — it may type a collector as a bit of an odd duck.

But it lets us ‘believers’ slow life down, de-stress, and play in ways reminiscent of childhood. A constant stream of new ‘toys’ is the price of admission. No apologies.

Should you wish to comment on this column, or have questions or ideas you would like to have explored in a future column, please write to John Hotchner, VSC Contributor, P.O. Box 1125, Falls Church, VA 22041-0125, or email, putting “VSC” in the subject line.

Or comment right here.

Dealing With Self-Sticks
By John M. Hotchner

Hardly any stamp collector is happy with the Postal Service’s practice, begun in earnest in 2007, of producing increasing numbers of self-stick issues that when used, can’t be floated free of the envelope paper.

The reason given was that they were saving on the cost of the stamp paper. But this developed later. Initially there was no announcement. Collectors made the discovery through trying to wash new issues so as to have a nice clean example to put in the album.

Actually about a quarter of what is issued these days can be soaked off — even today. But the remainder either have to be specially treated, stamp by stamp, to be removed. Or, they have to be left on neatly clipped (hope- fully thin) paper and put in the album.

The latter will not bother some people, but as most of us are creatures of habit, the change from the old way is annoying. It makes the presentation of a used collection on album pages a bit disorderly with different thicknesses and colors of envelope paper. Even mint self-stick stamps have to be left on their backing paper when displayed in albums. Thus, fewer stamps will t on a page, and albums get thicker faster. Not a few collectors have reacted to this new era by combining this problem with ever higher face values of stamps, and using these excuses to stop collecting U.S. stamps issued after 2000, or to leave the hobby altogether.

But are the changes really fatal, or do they simply force changes in collecting with which we are unhappy? Are we over-reacting to what we see as high handedness on the part of the USPS? Personally, I feel it, and there can be little doubt that there is some of this in the reaction of collectors. As confirmation, we saw it in letters to the editor in the philatelic press as the USPS went to unwashable self-sticks, and then decreed that all issues would be self-sticks.

The latter decision was popular with the public, but it was anything but for collectors. It is still my belief that this could be “fixed” by leaving mail-use stamps self-stick, and issuing commemoratives as lick-and-stick since their purpose is to be sold to collectors. And I would like to see the Postal Service return to the days of washable self-sticks. This would seem to be only rational given that reporting in the philatelic press indicated that the stamps issued without that feature actually cost more than washable stamps.

But I’m dreaming. Back to reality.

The basic question is this: Will you let the changes wrought by the USPS drive you out of the hobby? Or will you find a way to adapt? I can’t picture life without stamp collecting! So adapting is the way I have gone, and the way I recommend.

For those who think that they will teach the Postal Service a thing or two by dropping out with a blast in the Letters to the Editor column, forget it. They have set their course, and are “driving hard to the basket”, to mix a metaphor.

The only power you have is the power of the purse. If you do not spend money on their products, that has an impact. But the USPS is busily about the task of recruiting new collectors who take as a given the new reality. Apparently, they are having success sufficient to offset losses of old-line collectors who are dropping out.

So, the first way to adapt, is not dropping out alto- gether but limiting U.S. stamp collecting to those issues that are pleasing; say ending with the issues of 2000 or 2005. You save on supplements as well as stamps. And this allows you to spend available money on lling in older spaces with those beautifully engraved stamps of yesteryear.

But if, like me, you maintain your interest in the cur- rent issues of the USPS, then there are several avenues you can take:

1. In choosing stamps-on-paper for your album, consider the color and thickness of stamps to be part of condition. Thin white paper is the goal, and just as you would replace a heavily cancelled stamp with one that is lightly cancelled, replace thick red paper when you can.

2. Choose the margin size you will use for consistency, and trim the excess paper so that your album page looks nice.

3. Obtain and learn to use the Scott U.S. Specialized Catalogue, which has a feature identifying those modern stamps that can and cannot be washed. Then wash what you can. I am hopeful that Scott will eventually add this feature to the U.S. listings in Volume I of the Standard Catalogue. (Note: Keep in mind that I have found several stamps that Scott indicates can be washed are at best very difficult, and at worst, actually won’t wash. Best to try one or two before trying to wash quantities.)

[Note: For three years, The Virtual Stamp Club kept track of which U.S. self-adhesives were soakable, through the hard work of volunteer John Cropper. Then he had to move on, and no one else was able to undertake this task. But the “Soaking Stoplight” information is still online here for 2008, 2009 and 2010. — VSC]

4. Consider removing the envelope paper from stamps destined for your album using one of the spray or chemical products that have been discussed in Linn’s [Stamp News] and The American Philatelist (mostly in letters to the editor). Although it takes more time than the old float-free method, and for that reason is not suitable for large quantities, it works well on individual stamps. I use non-aerosol “Pure Citrus” Orange Air Freshener which is available at Home Depot and other locations. It is effective and non-toxic.

I will close with an offer. I will provide a write-up on how I use “Pure Citrus”, and/or a write-up of how to separate some of the more difficult soakable stamps from paper to any reader who requests one or both. If you want these, please write to me, specifying which, and enclose 10¢ in mint postage to cover photocopying, and a stamped addressed envelope. Send to me at PO Box 1125, Falls Church, VA 22041-0125.

Should you wish to comment on this column, or have questions or ideas you would like to have explored in a future column, please write to John Hotchner, VSC Contributor, P.O. Box 1125, Falls Church, VA 22041-0125, or email, putting “VSC” in the subject line.

Or comment right here.

A United States Bucket List
By John M. Hotchner

Not so long ago bucket lists burst on the scene. If your nose was in your albums and you missed it, the idea was put forward that all of us approaching the September of our lives should make a list of those things we wished to do or see before December 31st of our lives.

Well, here I am at about October 25, and as a charter member of the procrastinators’ club, I’m just getting to this task. I’ve recently done such a list with a worldwide perspective, and found it interesting to put a laser-like focus on what I really want to get done. A friend who saw it suggested that I ought to narrow the scope to U.S. philately only, and provide it here as a means of encouraging our U.S. collector community members to do their own lists.

The size of the list is an issue. Some are satisfied with ten items. It is said that too many disappointments are the result of too many expectations, but I’ll chance it. Thus, my list presented here is 20 items; which actually works out to one a year until I’m 93. That seems do-able, if maybe a tad ambitious.

But the point is not so much to get it all done as to help the mind to have a sense of what is really important versus what is passing fancy. This can be useful for resource allocation–what will we spend both time and money on–and for sense of satisfaction as items are crossed off.

Given that no one wants to reach the end of the list and have nothing to live for, so to speak, my method will be to add something to the list every time I cross something off. It is important to have a challenge to get up for every morning!

This is a highly individual exercise. Which is a way of saying that my list won’t work for you. But perhaps it will serve as a guide on the sorts of things that you want to consider for your own list. So, even those of you who are at March 1st of your lives, I hope you will do this exercise. Dream big!

Here is my effort:

1. Find a U.S. Scott #613, the rotary press-printed 2¢ Black Harding, perf 11. There are about 65 examples known, and I believe there are more waiting to be discovered. Since buying one is out of the question (Cat. Value: $40,000), I measure every 2¢ Harding I come across. Maybe lightening will strike!

2. Get up enough courage to start collecting U.S. revenues. I have a set of Scott album pages, but the project looks daunting. Yet much of it is affordable, and interesting, and I want to get started, but just have not been able to nd the time–or make the time.

3. Solve the mystery of the 3¢ Servicewomen commemorative of 1952, Scott #1013, which features four servicewomen as portrayed by professional models. I know the name of one. Who are the others? Research in the les of the USPS, Bureau of Engraving and Printing, and Defense Department have failed to bring the names to light. Someone must know.?

4. My hoard of Korean War postal history awaits. I bought a first class exhibit several years ago, and have my own material gathered over 30 years to add to it; and continue to find new covers. The task now is to recast and improve the exhibit.

5. My U.S. clipping files have as much unfiled material as what is in the folders. This is a project that needs some serious work.

6. Get used copies of the USIR-watermarked 8¢ Sherman (Scott #272a) and $1 Prexie (#832b) for my collection.

7. Do or update at least one one-frame exhibit a year: Pending are #C22 international uses, C32 international uses, methods of marking repaired and rejected material in the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, and The Naked Maja in U.S. philately. (Readers may notice a theme here: there is an awful lot of exhibiting going on, but it has become over the years one of my favorite creative outlets, and I can’t get enough of it!)

8. Update my 1934 and 1935 Christmas seal multi-frame exhibits.

9. Encourage those who can make it happen to get a U.S. philatelic periodical on U.S. newsstands. I’m convinced that this could make a real difference in bringing 30-somethings and beyond into the hobby.

10. Give a presentation on U.S. Error, Freak and Oddity Collecting at the Royal Philatelic Society, London.

11. Reread the George Brett book on Giori Printing; the best exposition of a complex subject that marked a turning point (in the mid-1950s) in U.S. stamp production; enabling multicolor printing, and bringing life to what had been almost entirely a monocolor stamp program.

12. Convince Scott Catalogue editors to include the Allied Military Government issues from Austria, France, Germany and Italy in the U.S. Specialized Catalogue; not to mention the Korean issues. Scott includes Ryukyus, but that is only a good start.

13. Organize a 40-year accumulation of Washington-Franklin (3rd Bureau Issue) local precancels, and while I’m at it, try to discover a Scott #544, the 1¢ Rotary Press sheet waste stamp; often seen precancelled.

14. Do a booklet or book on the 60+ instances where living people are shown on U.S. stamps. This has been one focus of my Linn’s reporting over the years, and there are many interesting stories to be told.

15. Find for my mourning covers collection, a cover to or from a funeral home that was sent to a dead letter office (preferably in Deadwood, South Dakota).

16. Make sense, and maybe an exhibit, of a 50-year accumulation of U.S. postal cards with printed messages on the back that show the everyday and often mundane activities of Americans in the late 19th and early 20th centuries; from birth to death.

17. Judging at the next U.S. international: 2026 in Boston!

18. Write an article on U.S. postal counterfeits each year for the book-length Fakes Forgeries Experts, produced under the auspices of the International Association of Philatelic Experts (AIEP).

19. Spend some time every day, washing, organizing, cataloguing, and putting stamps in my albums. It is surprising how easy it is for that set of activities to take last place.

20. Be around, at age 97, to celebrate and ponder the glorious 200th anniversary of postage stamps in the year 2040, and maybe even the equally glorious 200th anniversary of U.S. postage stamp general issues in 2047. Medical science is making great strides in extending life!

Fulfilling some of the entries in this list will depend upon luck (rather than bucks), medical practitioners, help from friends, will power, and the grace of God. But hopefully in 20 years or so, I can look back and say I’ve crossed at least half off the list. Now, get started on your list!

Should you wish to comment on this column, or have questions or ideas you would like to have explored in a future column, please write to John Hotchner, VSC Contributor, P.O. Box 1125, Falls Church, VA 22041-0125, or email, putting “VSC” in the subject line.

Or comment right here.