APS Editor Barb Boal To Retire

[press release; comments below]
Barb-BoalAfter 33 years of service at the American Philatelic Society, AP Editor Barb Boal has announced her plans to retire as of December 31. In addition to the traditional editor functions, Barb has done all the layout and most of the design of the magazine. She has been our principal contact with the printer, provided graphic support for shows and other departments, assisted with social media and marketing, and taught educational courses. Barb has guided us as the magazine has moved to full color, gone computer-to-plate, overseen the development of a digital version, and most recently was the impetus behind the development of a mobile application for the magazine.

Barb says, “It has been an educational and enjoyable time for me. I learned stamp collecting and printing from the ground up from the best — Bill Welch, Charlie Rupert, and Joe Criscuoli…. During the reprinting of Fundamentals of Philately, Norman Williams joked that I must be the only one to have ever read Fundamentals cover to cover!

“Over the past thirty-three years, I have been fortunate to work with collectors from around the world. In addition to the pleasure and pride that we receive in producing the AP for members, it has been recognized by its peers, winning three International Golds and being presented with the Álvaro Bonilla Lara Award.”

This position has the primarily responsibility for the Society’s full-color 100-page monthly publication, The American Philatelist. Working with a staff of three and an Advisory Board, the position reviews and selects editorial content including articles, columns, and letters to the editor. The individual lays out editorial content and prepares ads, creating digital Indesign files for the printer. Additional preparation is required for a mobile application and bonus online content. The Editor provides oversight for the quarterly Philatelic Literature Review and is the principal contact with the printer.

The Editor also provides graphics support for other departments, such as design of digital billboards; postcards and ads; cachets; logos and show cancels; and brochures. Support and input is also expected for the monthly e-newsletter.

The position requires editing skills, excellent graphic and layout skills, and Indesign proficiency. Philatelic knowledge is very helpful. Candidates should be self-directed and possess strong organizational and problem solving skills. A Bachelors Degree is required and supervisory experience desirable. Salary range is $55K to $65K, depending on qualifications. Position reports to the APS Executive Director.

If you are interested in the position or know someone who you think should be considered, resumes with a cover letter must be submitted to Executive Director Ken Martin, kpmartin@stamps.org, by October 15. Desired starting date is December 1 to allow for a smooth transition.

The American Philatelic Society, founded in 1886, is the national stamp collecting organization of the United States, with more than 31,000 members. For more information about the Society and its services, contact the APS at 100 Match Factory Place Bellefonte, PA; e-mail (info@stamps.org) or visit APS online at www.stamps.org.

Reward Offered For Stolen Jennys

[press release]
Sundman Offers Reward For APRL’s Stolen McCoy Inverted Jenny Stamps

Recovered C3a position 65(Camden, New York) — Donald Sundman, President of Mystic Stamp Company in Camden, New York, is offering a reward of up to $100,000 to locate the two still-missing Inverted Jenny (Scott C3a) stamps from a block of four stolen nearly 60 years ago. The block was owned at the time of theft by Ethel B. McCoy of New York City who later donated two subsequently-recovered stamps and legal rights to the other two to the American Philatelic Research Library (APRL). [One of the recovered stamps, position 65, is shown here.]

Sundman is offering the reward of $50,000 per stamp on behalf of the APRL. He made the reward announcement at the Aerophilately 2014 convention banquet, September 13, 2014, at the American Philatelic Society headquarters in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania.

SundmanDon“It’s possible that the two remaining missing stamps were innocently acquired by collectors decades ago who did not realize they had been stolen. With the passage of time, the heirs of those collectors may not realize they’ve inherited stolen property,” said Sundman (left).

For 19 years the stamps were the prize possession of Ethel B. McCoy (1893 – 1980), a patron of performing arts and an avid collector whose father, Charles Bergstresser, was a co-founder of the Dow Jones company.

In the 1986 book, The Inverted Jenny: Mystery, Money, Mania, author George Amick described McCoy as “…a woman of many interests. As the only child of one of the great innovators of American business and the wife of two other successful businessmen, she could afford to indulge them.”

McCoy’s first husband, Bert A. Stewart, a coin collector, died in 1936. In 1941 she married a prominent stamp collector, Walter R. McCoy, and they were active in philatelic organizations. In 1937 she was named a director of the American Air Mail Society and was posthumously named to the American Philatelic Society Hall of Fame in 1981.

McCoy acquired the block of four 24¢ Inverted Jenny airmail stamps — positions 65, 66, 75 and 76 from the original, unique pane of 100 — for $16,000 from Spencer Anderson in 1936. It was stolen in September 1955 while on exhibit at the American Philatelic Society convention in Norfolk, Virginia.

The hobby’s greatest cold case is the subject of a cover story by Ken Lawrence in the September 2014 issue of American Philatelist, the journal of the APS.

“There is still mystery and intrigue surrounding the theft,” said Rob Haeseler, Chairman of the American Philatelic Research Library’s McCoy Reward Committee.

“The McCoy block was deftly plucked from the Norfolk exhibit in broad daylight as the show prepared to open for the day. The thief cut a cord binding two of the exhibit frames and slid back the covering sheet of glass several inches. Armed guards had been stationed in the exhibit hall. A suspect has never been named.”

The block was broken apart, and one of the stolen stamps (position 75) was discovered in 1977, another (position 65) in 1981. Both were recovered with the participation of the FBI. Before she died at the age of 87 in 1980, McCoy donated both of them along with the legal rights to the two still-missing stamps to the APRL.

In 1981, the recovered position 75 Inverted Jenny was sold at auction on behalf of the APRL for $115,000. In 1988, the APRL offered a $10,000 reward for each of the two still-missing stamps, but neither one was located.

“The Inverted Jenny stamps are a philatelic treasure, but title to the two missing McCoy stamps belongs to the APRL,” Sundman explained. “If someone tried to sell one of them now, it would be seized and they’d have nothing. This is an opportunity to turn in the stamps for a $50,000 reward for each one, assuming they have not been damaged beyond recognition.”

In 2005, Sundman traded one of the two known 1868 Ben Franklin 1¢ “Z Grill” (Scott 85A) stamps for the numbered plate block of four Inverted Jenny stamps then owned by Wall Street bonds trader Bill Gross. The exchange was valued at $6 million at the time.

The reward offer for the missing McCoy stamps is being made by Sundman for one year, through September 2015.

In his article about the theft, Lawrence wrote: “It’s likely that nearly everyone who might have personal knowledge of the theft and subsequent dispersal of the McCoy inverts has died, but perhaps they left behind evidence, or perhaps the stolen stamps reside in estates whose beneficiaries don’t know what they have. Let’s all do our best to spread the word. Recovering one or both of the missing McCoy inverts will not only benefit APRL financially, it will elevate the stature of our hobby, and it will add yet another page to an epic that is not likely to be completed in our lifetimes.”

Anyone with information about the missing stamps can contact the American Philatelic Society at (800) 782-9580 extension 246 or by email at Jenny@stamps.org.

Purple Heart – 2014 Reprint

purple-heart-scratchVSC member Chris Lazaroff reports a 2014 version of this veteran stamp will be issued on October 11 in Dover Delaware at the Dover Stamp Club’s show. The format is not know.

From the October 2nd Postal Bulletin:

On October 11, 2014, in Dover, DE, the U.S. Postal Service® will re-issue the Purple Heart Medal stamp, Forever® First Class Mail® priced at 49 cents, in one design, in a pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) pane of 20 stamps

The Purple Heart Medal stamp design features a photograph taken by Ira Wexler of a Purple Heart medal awarded during World War II. The 2011 Purple Heart with Ribbon stamp was reworked in 2012 to display a slightly larger image of the Purple Heart medal on a pure white background. Designed by art director Jennifer Arnold, the stamp was given the name Purple Heart Medal.

How to Order the First-Day-of-Issue Postmark:
Customers have 60 days to obtain the first-day-of-issue postmark by mail. They may purchase new stamps at their local Post Office, at The Postal Store® website at http://www.usps.com/shop, or by calling 800-STAMP-24. They should affix the stamps to envelopes of their choice, address the envelopes (to themselves or others), and place them in a larger envelope addressed to:

Purple Heart Medal Stamp
Postmaster
Dover Post Office
55 Loockerman Plaza
Dover, DE 19901-9998

After applying the first-day-of-issue postmark, the Postal Service will return the envelopes through the mail. There is no charge for the postmark up to a quantity of 50. For more than 50, customers have to pay five cents each. All orders must be postmarked by December 10, 2014.

There are two philatelic products for this stamp issue:

  • 125416, First-Day Cover, $0.93.
  • 125431, Stamped Deck Card, $0.95.

Technical Specifications:

purpleheart2014Issue: Purple Heart Medal Stamp
Item Number: 115400
Denomination & Type of Issue: Forever First-Class Mail
Format: Pane of 20 (1 design)
Series: N/A
Issue Date & City: October 11, 2014, Dover, DE 19901
Designer: Jennifer Arnold, Washington, DC
Art Director: Jennifer Arnold, Washington, DC
Typographer: Greg Breeding, Charlottesville, VA
Artist: Ira Wexler, Braddock Heights, MD
Engraver: WRE
Modeler: CCL Label, Inc.
Manufacturing Process: Gravure
Printer: CCL Label, Inc.
Printed at: Clinton, SC 29325
Press Type: Dia Nippon Kiko (DNK)
Stamps per Pane: 20
Print Quantity: 70 million stamps
Paper Type: Prephosphored, Type I
Adhesive Type: Pressure-sensitive adhesive
Processed at: CCL Label, Inc., Clinton, SC
Colors: Yellow, Magenta, Cyan, Black, Purple 266, Red 1805
Stamp Orientation: Vertical
Image Area (w x h): 0.73 x 0.84 in./18.54 x 21.34 mm
Overall Size (w x h): 0.87 x 0.98 in./22.10 x 24.90 mm
Full Pane Size (w x h): 5.25 x 4.83 in./133.35 x 122.55 mm
Plate Size: 420 stamps per revolution
Plate Numbers: “C” followed by six (6) single digits
Marginal Markings:
Front: Plate numbers in four corners of pane
Back: © 2012 USPS • USPS logo • Plate position diagram • Barcode (115400) in upper right and lower left corners of pane • Promotional text

Linn’s: No U.S. Bollywood Stamp

Linn’s Stamp News reports here that Indians and Indian-Americans were very excited to hear that veteran Bollywood actor Akkineni Nageswarara Rao was going to be honored with a U.S. stamp on September 20th.

Unfortunately for them, the U.S. Postal Service says it has no knowledge of such a stamp. (Of course, given communications within the USPS, maybe there will be such a stamp.)

Bill McAllister of Linn’s says U.S. Postal Service press rep Mark Saunders isn’t able to contact the Akkineni Foundation of America, the source of the story. I “googled” the Foundation, and found no web listing for it — just loads of South Asian news stories about the upcoming Rao stamp. Even Wikipedia now says he was “conferred with U.S. post stamp!” (reproducing the agency name error  in all the news reports.)

It sounds like a hoax to me, one that took in Wikipedia, the Times of India, The Hindu newspaper and more.

Myself, I have no idea who Rao is other than a star of Indian cinema, commonly called “Bollywood,” but I would support a Rao stamp just for the fun of seeing all the American first day cover cachetmakers misspell “Akkineni Nageswarara Rao.”

It reminds me of a stamp for a baseball star in 1984. Since this was pretty much before personal computer printers, a number of Washington, DC-area cachetmakers had given their designs to a collector and professional printer for production. He brought their boxes of envelopes to a Robert C. Graebner (AFDCS) chapter meeting. The cachetmakers eagerly opened the boxes… to find that the printer had “corrected” the text in all their designs so that they were commemorating Pittsburgh slugger Roberto Clemento.

—Lloyd de Vries

Hotchner: Computers & Philately

The March of the Computer in Philately: Positive or ???????
by John M. Hotchner

hotchnerComputers and the Internet are at best a mixed blessing, if one looks at the digital age from the standpoint of some in organized philately. Why? Collectors often see no need to pay money to subscribe to publications and to join organizations when there is so much free information out there on the World Wide Web. We can connect to others whose interests match our own. We can buy and sell virtually any type of philatelic material. We can access most of the dealer community through our keyboards. We can subscribe to free message boards and other websites that not only bring news and opinion about the latest goings on in the hobby, but let us participate with our own opinions nearly instantaneously. Do you have a question about something you own, or need guidance on how to catalog a difficult specimen? Put it out there for the online community, and you will have dozens of answers in two shakes of a lamb’s tail.

While I don’t have reliable figures, I know from observation that more and more stamp and cover collectors are getting online. When I began this journey myself in 1996, I was in the minority. Now, it is the person without the Internet who is the odd duck.

This does not make them bad people, or an object of ridicule. Some just don’t feel the need, don’t see enough benefit to justify the expense, or are technophobes who dislike steep learning curves. As Ogden Nash is reported to have said, “Progress may have been all right once, but it has gone on entirely too long.” No amount of pushing or shoving is going to move them from their easy chair to the computer store.

But for those of us who have at least begun to adapt to the new age, and know a computer professional and/or have someone under 30 who can help us overcome the problems, the computer is a blessing for exactly the reasons that it costs subscriptions and memberships. For that reason, it is the wise organization, dealer and publication that also works to adapt to the computer age. Those who fail to do so will be left in the dust.

And philately as a whole is in this same situation. Those who might become stamp collectors are also increasingly turning to the Internet to learn about the hobby, how to participate, what resources are available, how to get their questions answered. Organizations that are holding their membership numbers report significantly increasing percentages of their new members are signing up by way of the computer. The smart groups are using the computer to introduce themselves to a wide range of newcomers in several ways:

1. Having an attractive website that answers questions, explains the benefits of membership, and makes joining easy.

2. Putting older issues of their journals online

3. Putting the new issues into Members Only sections of their website, and including the table of contents in the generally available portion.

4. Including “How To” information, a library of related literature, and encouraging participation in society activities.

5. Including a Members Only auction in the public part of the website so prospects know what is available to be bought, and see the possibility of selling material as a club member.

For local clubs, the hardest part has always been letting newcomers know that they exist. Can your club be found when someone looking for a club puts into their search engine: “stamp clubs in ___(city)_____, ___(state)____”? The second hardest part has been enticing people to actually visit. A nicely done website that tells people where and when the meetings are, who to contact for further information, and making the club enticing fixes that. Then the third difficult part kicks in: treating visitors right when they arrive. But that is a subject for another column!

Perhaps the most difficult situation is that faced by print publications as the news can be spread so much faster by Internet. Subscribers do see a benefit in having news and features in one place rather than having to search for it. So, many publications are making their offerings available in color, on the web as rapidly as possible (well before it arrives in the mail), and at a reduced price. Some even have an extra web publication to bring breaking news to the subscribers

Organized philately is adapting because they have come to the proper conclusion that modern technology is neither a fluke nor going to be reversed. It is here to stay and we have to learn to use it. Those that don’t will wither away. And if the hobby as a whole fails to do so, it will be inviting disaster. Without a robust web presence recruiting for the hobby, it will not grow. And if that happens, we will see a stronger version of the trend we saw in the early years. Which is to say that the hobby sailed along oblivious and failed to adapt. while the computer gathered more and more adherents, and the hobby lost market share. Indeed it was the rare organization that did not lose a third to half its membership – mostly never to return – while they dawdled about whether to have a web presence, and if so, what sort of presence to have.

We seem as a hobby to have done a reasonable job reversing that trend, but we cannot rest on our laurels. Confounding those who believe as Ogden Nash did, technology continues to trample the old ways of doing things, and we must keep up or die. The new reality, using the computer and marrying it to phone technology, is the explosion in social media, and again as a hobby, we are lagging the power curve. We seem to have missed the fact that the world is spinning at a faster rate, and the time we have to make decisions that allow us to catch the comet’s tail has been compressed. The day of leisurely consideration, waiting to see what happens in the longer term, and decisions that consider every well researched alternative are a luxury we sometimes do not have.

Stamp collecting used to be a quiet, introverted, even solitary activity. Now as the general public becomes more interactive, a larger and larger percentage of collectors think of the hobby as having a dynamic edge that allows them to maintain much of their anonymity if desired while benefitting from the resources the computer brings to their desktop. And at the same time, it seems that fewer and fewer of those who have grown and are growing up in the information age are oriented toward the anonymity that so many collectors used to value. How you react to this state of affairs probably reflects your age and your experience with technology. But as noted above, those running organizations no longer have the luxury of sitting back and waiting to see where technology goes. We need to be managing our future, not merely adapting to it.

If we are going to survive as a hobby, and permanently stop the slide that befell us in the 1990s and early 2000s, we must expand the resources offered to new collectors, continue to innovate as we reach out to potential collectors through social media, and keep our eyes on new products that will further change our playing field.


Should you wish to comment on this editorial, or have questions or ideas you would like to have explored in a future column, please write to John Hotchner, VSC Contributor, P.O. Box 1125, Falls Church, VA 22041-0125, or email, putting “VSC” in the subject line.

Or comment right here.

Israel: Tel Aviv – Global City stamp

From Israel Post; this stamp will be issued September 9, 2014
Tel Aviv – Global City

isr_telavivOn April 11, 1909 a few dozen people gathered on a sand dune to the northeast of Jaffa in order to allot plots of land for a new neighborhood called “Ahuzat Bayit”. Akiva Aryeh Weiss, the chairman of the lottery vowed they would build the “New York of Eretz Israel”. The founders of Tel Aviv were undoubtedly visionaries who dreamed large dreams despite the small odds.

Today, more than 100 years after the founding of Tel Aviv, the city is the gateway to Israel. It is an urban economic and cultural center on a global level. The city is now at the height of a groundbreaking strategic process to establish itself as one of the world’s twenty leading cities.

A “global city” is a leading city that constitutes an international business center which directly and tangibly affects world affairs. Tel Aviv has been strategically positioned as “the Startup City”, encouraging entrepreneurship and innovation in order to give it a relative advantage over other cities.

This move is the fruit of collaboration among the Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality, the government of Israel, the business sector, cultural and artistic institutions of Greater Tel-Aviv and most of all – the residents of Tel Aviv-Yafo. The goal is to improve the quality of life that the city offers its residents and visitors by attracting international resources and investments. The Tel Aviv Global Administration was founded as part of this strategy.

Tel Aviv-Yafo, the first Hebrew city and now a global city as well, will continue to be a profoundly Israeli city, all the while being a global leader in the fields of economics, tourism, culture and society. It serves not only as a source of pride for its residents, but also contributes greatly to Israel’s global image, economy, financial stability and cultural, academic and social achievements.

Ron Huldai
Mayor of Tel Aviv-Yafo

Technical Specifications:
Stamp Size (mm): H 30 / W 40
Plates: 954
Stamps per Sheet: 10
Tabs per Sheet: 5
Method of printing: Offset
Security mark: Microtext
Printer: Cartor Security Printing, France

Canada’s 2015 Stamps

From the July-August issue of Details magazine, the Canada Post philatelic catalogue:

new multi-year series, Provincial Birds (no month given)

January
canflag453Lunar New Year/Year of the Ram
200th anniv of Sir. John A. Macdonald (Canada’s first prime minister and a leading figure in the formation of the Dominion of Canada in 1867.

February
50th anniversary of the Canadian Flag
Responsible Pet Ownership

March
Pansies (annual flower series)

April
Canadian Photography (third in the series, specific subject not announced.)

May
100th anniversary of John McCrae’s In Flanders Fields, a poem from World War I
More UNESCO World Heritage Sites
Canadian dinosaurs & other prehistoric creatures

June
FIFA Women’s World Cup, which is being hosted by Canada in 2015 from June 6 to July 5.
Canadian Weather Extremes (launch of a new series)

September
Canada Post Community Foundation fund-raising stamp
Haunted Canada (continuing series)

October
NHL Heroes (third in a series)
Madonna & Child
Deck the Halls

We will update this page as new information becomes available.

Petersburg First Day Ceremony Photos

Courtesy the U.S. Postal Service.

petersburg_saunders02The audience inside the tent. VSC member Foster Miller is at the center of the photograph, second row. Photo by Mark Saunders, USPS.

petersburg_afzal05Chief U.S. Postal Service Inspector Guy Cottrell dedicated the stamps just yards from the location of an underground explosion — that took place150 years ago, on July 30, 1864 — which created a huge depression in the earth and led to the battle being named “Battle of the Crater.” Photo by Daniel Afzal, USPS.

petersburg_afzal10Lewis Rogers, Superintendent, Petersburg National Battlefield. Photo by Daniel Afzal, USPS.

petersburg_saunders00L to R: Living history reenactor Charles Harris, Sgt. 22nd United States Colored Troops Company A; Chris Bryce, Chief of Interpretation, Petersburg National Battlefield; Colonel Paul K. Brooks, Garrison Commander, Fort Lee Army Base; Guy Cottrell, Chief Postal Inspector, United States Postal Service; Lewis Rogers, Superintendent, Petersburg National Battlefield; Dr. Malcom Beech, President USCTLHA; James Blankenship Historian, Petersburg National Battlefield. Photo by Mark Saunders, USPS.

petersburg_afzal04Chris Bryce, Chief of Interpretation, Petersburg National Battlefield. Photo by Daniel Afzal, USPS.

petersburg_afzal03Colonel Paul K. Brooks, Garrison Commander, Fort Lee Army Base. Photo by Daniel Afzal, USPS.

petersburg_afzal08Dr. Malcom Beech, President USCTLHA and the 22nd United States Color Troops Company A. Photo by Daniel Afzal, USPS.

petersburg_saunders06Photo by Mark Saunders, USPS.

petersburg_saunders09Photo by Mark Saunders, USPS.

petersburg_saunders08Stamp sales and cancellations tent. Photo by Mark Saunders, USPS.

petersburg_saunders05Two reenactors examine a first day ceremony program. Photo by Mark Saunders, USPS.

petersburg_afzal02Reenactors portray a Confederate artillery crew: L to R: John Schmidt, Scissel Morris, Andrew Manning and Charlie Helmer of the Pegram’s Company of VA Light Artillery. Photo by Daniel Afzal, USPS.

petersburg_afzal01Photo by Daniel Afzal, USPS.

petersburg_afzal06U.S. Colored Troops (Union Army) reenactors. L to R: Leon Vaughan, Ludger K. Balan and Charles Harris Sgt. 22nd USCT (United States Colored Troops) Company A. Photo by Daniel Afzal, USPS.

petersburg_afzal11Reenactor Bill Savage, 46th VA Infantry Company F C.S.A. Photo by Daniel Afzal, USPS.

petersburg_saunders10An inside view of stamp sales. Photo by Mark Saunders, USPS.

Immoderate Moderation

2035194nce upon a time, in the early days of the Internet, when “14-4” was considered fast and pictures in discussion groups were nonexistent, there were two major stamp collecting discussion groups.

One was a Usenet newsgroup, based on the Internet (which relatively few people knew how to access), the other an e-mail “list.”

The newsgroup, called rec.collecting.stamps, was not only free of cost, but free of rules. As with e-mail, it didn’t take long for the hucksters to discover how easy it was to “spam” a group with get-rich-quick schemes and too-good-to-be-true offers, some of which were related to philately, but only some.

It was also a “wild west show,” in that, with no moderators nor rules, anyone could say anything, about any subject. Or anyone. Just as many drivers become bold and brave (in their eyes) or obnoxious and aggressive (others’ eyes) when hiding within their half-ton motorized cocoons, RCS and other Internet users discovered they could be anonymous, with no repercussions for anything they posted.

Soon the newsgroup split, into rec.collecting.stamps.discuss for discussions, another for sales pitches, a third for postal history and maybe others. However, people soon began to leave for more civilized discussion groups. RCSD may still exist today — I haven’t checked in years — but it’s just a few dozen people, if that many.

The other group, in e-mail, was based at Penn State, although I think its physical proximity to American Philatelic Society headquarters was a coincidence. At first, it too was free: Whatever was e-mailed to the group’s address went out immediately to the group.

Then one day, the owner/moderator became disgusted with some of the messages, and sabrinapix_lloyddecided to clamp down: From that point on, no messages could be posted until he approved them. The problem with that was that if he was busy, or sleeping, or otherwise occupied, the messages might stack up and not be distributed. And the moderator began to lose interest, which meant the delay got longer and longer and…

Last time I checked, which was a few years ago, the list was still operating: You could send a message to it, and in a week or so, the message would be distributed to the members of the list… if there are any. If anyone still cared about the message after several days in limbo.

The point is that over-moderation can kill an online discussion group, and under-moderation can do it in, too. It’s a delicate balance, and that focal point doesn’t stay put; it moves around. There is no formula.

But like a playground seesaw, staying at one end or the other doesn’t make for much of a ride.

—Lloyd A. de Vries