{"id":1910,"date":"2015-02-06T04:50:23","date_gmt":"2015-02-06T09:50:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/virtualstampclub.com\/lloydblog\/?p=1910"},"modified":"2015-02-06T04:50:23","modified_gmt":"2015-02-06T09:50:23","slug":"scott-changes-mind-on-jenny-unverts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/virtualstampclub.com\/lloydblog\/?p=1910","title":{"rendered":"Scott Changes Mind On Jenny &#8220;Unverts&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Scott Catalogues are going to list the upright Jenny Invert stamps (what I call the &#8220;unverts&#8221;) after all. In an article in the February 16, 2015, issue of co-owned Linn&#8217;s Stamp News, editor Chad Snee says the decision was made after &#8220;a number of dealers and collectors contacted Scott, questioning the wisdom of the decision to not assign a catalog number.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Snee says to be listed, stamps must be valid for postage, and the country issuing them must have a functioning postal system. The Scott listing police says the goal is &#8220;to seek reasons why a stamp should be listed, rather than why it should not.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The panes will get a minor letter variety of Sc. 4806, starting with the 2016 U.S. Specialized catalogue.<\/p>\n<p>The question begs, however: If these souvenir sheets, which cannot be (knowingly) purchased at a post office nor (knowingly) ordered from Stamp Fulfillment Services, are listed, what then of the Vintage Circus Posters souvenir sheet, which was only available as part of a press sheet or in the expensive 2014 Stamp Yearbook? They are valid for postage, and the U.S. has a functioning postal service.<\/p>\n<p>My guess is that they will be listed, too.<\/p>\n<p>Scott has also decided to list imperforate press sheets, because they are available in sufficient quantities for &#8220;market demand,&#8221; and to make organizing a collection easier.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Scott Catalogues are going to list the upright Jenny Invert stamps (what I call the &#8220;unverts&#8221;) after all. In an article in the February 16, 2015, issue of co-owned Linn&#8217;s Stamp News, editor Chad Snee says the decision was &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/virtualstampclub.com\/lloydblog\/?p=1910\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1910","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-scottnums"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/virtualstampclub.com\/lloydblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1910","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/virtualstampclub.com\/lloydblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/virtualstampclub.com\/lloydblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/virtualstampclub.com\/lloydblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/virtualstampclub.com\/lloydblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1910"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/virtualstampclub.com\/lloydblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1910\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1911,"href":"https:\/\/virtualstampclub.com\/lloydblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1910\/revisions\/1911"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/virtualstampclub.com\/lloydblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/virtualstampclub.com\/lloydblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1910"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/virtualstampclub.com\/lloydblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}